Intel continues to make people laugh and prove the superiority of its processors over AMD chips (5 photos)

Competition between Intel and AMD in the marketprocessors for desktop and mobile processors is becoming increasingly rigid. Intel representatives are trying by any means to prove the superiority of their chips, created using 14 nm technology, over the processors of rival AMD, which already uses 7 nm technical process.

Testing by IntelWe compared the performance of a 6-core Core i7-10750H (Comet Lake-H, 14 nm) and an 8-core AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Renoir-H, 7 nm). The test was carried out using Intel's proprietary "Real World Performance" methodology.

Mobile Processor SpecificationsIntel Core i7-10750, manufactured using a 14 nm process technology, is as follows: 6 cores with a frequency of 2.6-5.0 GHz, 12 threads and a TDP of 45 W (PL1). For AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 7nm Processor: 8 cores @ 2.9-4.2GHz, SMT multi-threaded processing and 45W TDP.

Lenovo laptops took part in the testsR7000-2020 powered by AMD and Lenovo Y7000-2020 powered by Intel. Both computers have NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti graphics cards, 16GB DDR4 memory and 512GB SSD. Monitors with a resolution of 1080p. Operating system Windows 10 Home V1909 18363.836. The difference in laptop configuration only affected memory: 2933 MHz for Intel and 3200 MHz for AMD.

According to the test results, Intel specialists cameto the conclusion that the performance of the Core i7-10750 exceeds the Ryzen 7 4800H for gaming applications by 37%, and for standard applications by 25%. This advantage can be attributed to some manipulation by company representatives.

First of all, it should be noted that forThe tests used games in which Intel was known to have an advantage over AMD. A total of 36 gaming applications tested using default settings.

As a result, only one game showed a 37% increase in FPS in favor of Intel. In the 21st game, Intel's advantage was from 3 to 10%, and in one game the indicators were practically the same.

The best game on Intel Core i7-10750 was Tom Clancy's Division 2, which showed the same 37%.
Over 10% FPS on an Intel processor was shown inAssassin's Creed Odyssey, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Dota 2, F1 2019, FINAL FANTASY XIV: Shadowbringers, Grand Theft Auto V, JX3, League of Legends, Team Fortress 2, Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, Tom Clancy's The Division 2, Total War: Warhammer 2-Campaign, War Thunder Tank Battle, World of Warcraft.

In ARK games: Survival Evolved, Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation, Battlefield 1, Battlefield V, Borderlands 3, Call of Duty: Warzone, Far Cry 5, Far Cry New Dawn, FINAL FANTASY XV, HITMAN 2, Justice, Middle-earth: Shadow of War, Hunter on monsters: Peace, Moonblade, Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord, PLAYER UNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS (PUBG), Red Dead Redemption 2, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Total War: THREE KINGDOMS, World of Tanks enCore, World War Z Vulcan, Intel's advantage was from 3 to 10%.

The only game where Intel and AMD have shown similar results was Rise of the Tomb Raider.
Test for standard user applicationswas carried out on only 5 programs: Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint (PCMark 10), Chrome, SYSmark and Adobe Lightroom, which are obviously poorly optimized for multi-core processors. Notably, some applications where AMD beats Intel were excluded from the final report. However, full test results were found on the network and they are very eloquent.

Source: benchlife