If you believe that the consequences of the changeclimate will not come soon, they have to disappoint you. Numerous scientific studies show that global warming will lead to devastating consequences, including the movement of people around the planet on an unprecedented, destabilizing scale. Thus, droughts, floods, bankruptcy and famine are already forcing people to leave their homes. The situation is such that environmental hazards affect populations all over the planet and - under certain conditions - can stimulate migration. The most important factors are temperature changes, variability in precipitation and rapid-onset natural disasters such as tropical storms, according to a study conducted by scientists from the Postdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). The findings allow researchers to identify geographic regions that may be particularly susceptible to future migration movements. Has the Great Nations Migration really begun?
Great migration of peoples called mass migrations of the population in Europe tolate 4th-7th centuries, which is one of the main reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire and the basis for the formation of a modern ethnocultural map of Europe.
Migration of peoples
The history of mankind has about 2.4million years. However, according to a 2015 study, a bone fragment found in Ethiopia in 2013 suggests that humanity is several hundred thousand years older. As the authors of the work published in the journal Science write, the genus of primates of the hominid family existed on Earth already 2.8 million years ago.
It is important to understand that for the entire period of itsexistence human populations regularly migrated. So, the first to leave Africa and populate Eurasia was Homo erectus (Homo erectus), whose migrations began about 2 million years ago. It was followed by the expansion of Homo sapiens and its close relatives: Neanderthals and Denisovans. A modern man came to the Middle East about 80 thousand years ago.
Today, migration is called any territorialdisplacement of the population associated with the crossing of both external and internal borders in order to change their permanent residence or temporary stay in the territory for study or work, regardless of the factors contributing to resettlement.
For even more fascinating articles on the latest scientific discoveries in the field of ecology and climate, read our channel in Yandex.Zen. There are regularly published articles that are not on the site.
Ecological migration is most pronounced incountries with middle income, as well as in countries with developed agriculture. “Environmental factors can stimulate migration, but the magnitude of the impact depends on the specific economic and socio-political conditions in the countries,” writes the lead author of the new study, Roman Hoffmann.
In both low and high countriesincome level, the impact of the environment on migration is weaker. Presumably because either people are too poor to leave, or in rich countries people have enough financial resources to cope with the consequences. It is in the regions with average incomes and dependence on agriculture that strong waves of population migration are observed.
A large-scale meta-analysis, the results of which are published in the journal Nature Climate Change, revealed a number of interesting patterns. It turned out that impact on migration depends on the types of environmental hazards and that different hazards can mutually reinforceeach other. While temperature changes in the region have the greatest impact on migration, fast-onset natural disasters, changing rainfall variability and anomalies can also play a role.
Brave new world
As the authors of the meta-analysis emphasize,ecological migration always depends on a number of economic and socio-political factors. The story of climate refugees heading to Europe or the United States can be oversimplified. For example, researchers have found strong evidence that environmental change in vulnerable countries mainly leads to internal migration or migration to other low- and middle-income countries, rather than cross-border migration to high-income countries. Affected populations often migrate to places in their own region and eventually return to their homes within a relatively short period of time.
The study results also indicate a veryregions vulnerable to climate change, where ecological migration may be especially widespread. The authors of the work note that the population of Latin America and the Caribbean, several countries in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in the Sahel region and East Africa, as well as Western, South and Southeast Asia, are especially at risk.
See also: How climate change affects the human body and health?
Given the expected increase in the global averagetemperature, researchers believe that the topic of ecological migration in the future will begin to attract more attention. The best way to protect those affected is to stabilize the global climate, namely quickly reduce greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels... While migration can be efficientan adaptation strategy for households, it can be involuntary and accompanied by human suffering. However, the most important conclusion of this meta-analysis, in my opinion, is the fact that forced climatic migrations of large population groups can be avoided.